Monday, February 25, 2008
Friday, February 22, 2008
What Mark Roberts ignores about Judy Wood?
The cars shown in these pictures are setting in a car lot at a considerable distance from the event, yet some of them are toasted while others are hardly affected. Interestingly there is a line of sight between part of the parking lot, but some of it is in the shadow of WTC6, a 9 story building. It's like a heavy duty energy force was eminating from the direction of WTC1. This is just a small part of the weird stuff that went on that day, and there is plenty of documentation on Judy's site that should raise questions about EMF technology, Boing, and the military.
Parking lot from upper left of above picture
Parking lot from upper left of above picture
Some cars from the same parking lot. Note paper etc. that did not burn?
Behind WTC7 looking toward WTC1
This is from Judy Woods site: WTC7 looks REALLY good here! (It's the building on the right, a block away from where the camera person is standing.) It looks like those could be body parts on the sidewalk (arm or leg?). I believe this is after WTC1 goes poof, but am not sure. I have pictures from the next block up, next to WTC7, and it didn't look nearly as bad as this! So, I'm thinking that this part of the street got toasted when they did WTC1 and the other one (posted on http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/StarWarsBeam5.html) was after WTC2 and before WTC1.
Could SAR (synthetic aperture radar) reveal 911 evidence?
NASA TO PROVIDE SHARPER UNDERGROUND VIEW OF WORLD TRADE CENTER AREA
SpatialNews Press Release
Aug 30, 2002 Feb 27, 2003
NASA will apply its image-processing expertise to enhance underground radar images of the area around the World Trade Center in New York, providing a clearer picture of what's beneath the surface.
"Our image-processing techniques will provide the first enhanced subsurface images of the area around 'ground zero,'" said Dr. Amir Fijany, principal scientist and supervisor for the Ultracomputing Technology Research Group at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), Pasadena, Calif. "Our goal is to pinpoint utility lines and improve the overall sharpness of the images."
Witten Technologies, Inc., of Boston, will supply JPL with underground images from lower Manhattan created with ground- penetrating imaging radar in surveys done for Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (Con Edison) in August 2001 and January 2002.
JPL has been conducting remote sensing and image processing of Earth and other planets for more than four decades. Fijany led a similar assignment in subsurface imaging to detect unexploded ordnance for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. During this assignment, radar data collected by high-altitude airborne ground-penetrating synthetic aperture radar was used for subsurface imaging. Advanced image-processing techniques were then applied to the radar images.
The results from that work showed this type of remote sensing technology could detect very small features below the surface. Similar subsurface imaging technology will be applied to the images collected by Witten to enhance their overall quality.
The California Institute of Technology in Pasadena manages JPL for NASA.
Well, this was about five years ago and who knows if this study was completed or if the results now exist? But it would be really interesting to know if there have been any SAR images released of the World Trade Center after the disaster. Especially those using long wave lengths that in some cases can map all the way to bed rock. In the absence of evidence, most of which was either hauled away to the dump or smelted, the radar images could possibly contain some clues.
Development and Application of Small Spaceborne Synthetic Aperture Radars (1998)
The Committee on Earth Studies (CES) of the Space Studies Board is a standing committee charged with examining all areas of remote sensing of the Earth from space for civilian and related purposes. The charter includes the satellite-based Earth observation programs of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), as well as the merged polar-orbiting environmental satellites of NOAA and the former Defense Meteorological Satellite Program. In 1995, at the request of NASA's Office of Earth Science (formerly Office of Mission to Planet Earth), the committee began a two-part study on issues related to the development and utility of spaceborne synthetic aperture radar (SAR).
The potential of SAR for Earth science commercial and civil applications is being advanced by several satellite systems, including Shuttle-based SAR flights (SIR [Shuttle Imaging Radar]-A, SIR-B, SIR-C/X-SAR1) and the European Space Agency's (ESA's) ERS-1 and ERS-2. Significant contributions are also being realized from Japan's JERS-1 and Canada's Radarsat. Future systems such as ESA's Advanced Synthetic Aperture Radar (ASAR) and Japan's Ministry of International Trade and Industry (MITI) SAR-2 and Phased Array type L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar (PALSAR), an instrument proposed for the Advanced Land Observing Satellite (ALOS), promise to add even more data and processing knowledge to the global pool of SAR experience (Table 1.1). Aircraft support data from NASA's AIRSAR, Germany's E-SAR, and the Netherlands' PHARUS, among others, are used to complement these space measurements but also have helped to advance general understanding of radar reflection from the ground. These airborne systems continue to validate earlier NASA and commercial airborne radar applications and to expand understanding of signal-terrain interactions.
Nevertheless, the development of satellite SAR systems has lagged behind electro-optical systems popularized by the Landsat program inaugurated in 1972. The Landsat paradigm reoriented the remote sensing community toward detection of temporal change and away from the 1960s paradigm of spectral analysis of landscapes. The inertia generated by more than a decade of such focus translates today into a nation whose familiarity with SAR data lags far behind its understanding of data sets derived from sensors operating in the visible near-infrared (VNIR) and thermal infrared (TIR) spectra. Data from all spectral regions, including the microwave region, produce unique and, in some cases, vital information for Earth system science. Determination of the potential information content, however, and means of extracting that information from SAR
Wednesday, February 20, 2008
Sunday, February 17, 2008
Retired FDNY battalion chief Arthur Scheuerman slated for Feb. 26th on BBC's 911 Documentory
By Pomeroo
Hardfire News
17th January 2008
The BBC is planning a follow-up to the documentary on 9/11, concentrating on the collapse of WTC 7. The producer wants to use parts of a 'Hardfire' debate. I am planning to tape on February 26, and I assume that I will feature the redoubtable Mark Roberts and retired FDNY battalion chief Arthur Scheuerman for the rationalist sdie. As regulars here are aware, my search for fantasist opposition has proved fruitless. Jim Fetzer has volunteered for a rematch with Mark, and claims he can bring along an "expert" on WTC 7. Personally, I'm willing to go with Fetzer (maybe you'd prefer Les Jamieson--see what I mean?). Unlike every other prominent conspiracist, he doesn't get an attack of vapors whenever Mark's name is mentioned. Like soldiers for the Confederacy, he displays courage in the service of a bad cause.
To members of the fantasist community: If you don't feel comfortable with Jim Fetzer being presented as the face of your movement, then it's high time a new champion, someone with cajones, stepped up to the plate. No guts, no glory.
Hmm, most interesting that Pomeroo chooses Arthur Scheuerman for the rationalist side, yet calls Fetzer a conspiracy theorist. Arthur Scheuerman is listed as a member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice as well as Dr. James Fetzer. I guess this speaks volumes for the 911 Truth Movement, who can be seen for exactly what they are. Unbiased seekers of the truth, but only indicates a lopsided discussion to me, unless maybe Pomeroo plans on bringing in a truth seeking ex General, and maybe an Architect or Engineer (hard to find?) who questions the NIST report.
Hardfire News
17th January 2008
The BBC is planning a follow-up to the documentary on 9/11, concentrating on the collapse of WTC 7. The producer wants to use parts of a 'Hardfire' debate. I am planning to tape on February 26, and I assume that I will feature the redoubtable Mark Roberts and retired FDNY battalion chief Arthur Scheuerman for the rationalist sdie. As regulars here are aware, my search for fantasist opposition has proved fruitless. Jim Fetzer has volunteered for a rematch with Mark, and claims he can bring along an "expert" on WTC 7. Personally, I'm willing to go with Fetzer (maybe you'd prefer Les Jamieson--see what I mean?). Unlike every other prominent conspiracist, he doesn't get an attack of vapors whenever Mark's name is mentioned. Like soldiers for the Confederacy, he displays courage in the service of a bad cause.
To members of the fantasist community: If you don't feel comfortable with Jim Fetzer being presented as the face of your movement, then it's high time a new champion, someone with cajones, stepped up to the plate. No guts, no glory.
Hmm, most interesting that Pomeroo chooses Arthur Scheuerman for the rationalist side, yet calls Fetzer a conspiracy theorist. Arthur Scheuerman is listed as a member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice as well as Dr. James Fetzer. I guess this speaks volumes for the 911 Truth Movement, who can be seen for exactly what they are. Unbiased seekers of the truth, but only indicates a lopsided discussion to me, unless maybe Pomeroo plans on bringing in a truth seeking ex General, and maybe an Architect or Engineer (hard to find?) who questions the NIST report.
Thursday, February 7, 2008
THE HIDDEN HISTORY OF 9-11-2001
Credit for this informative information goes to...911Truth.org
THE HIDDEN HISTORY OF 9-11-2001: PROF. PAUL ZAREMBKA (SUNY Buffalo)
On August 9, 2007 at Chautauqua Institution, Paul Zarembka confronted Philip Zelikow. exec. director of the official 9/11 investigation, with a couple of uncensored questions. Professor Zarembka had done his homework. He is the editor of The Hidden History of 9-11-2001. In this video, Zarembka outlines the book's chapters: What we now know about the 9-11 hijackers (Jay Kolar); Initiation of the 9-11 operation, with evidence of insider trading beforehand (Zarembka); The destruction of the World Trade Center: why the official account can't be true (David Ray Griffin); The military drills on 9-11: bizarre coincidence or something else? (Four Arrows aka Don Jacobs); Terrorism and Statecraft: Al-Qaeda and western covert operations after the Cold War (Nafeez Mossaddeq Ahmed); September 11 as Machiavellian State Terror (David MacGregor); Making History: the compromised 9-11 Commission (Bryan Sacks); Islamophobia and the War on Terror: the continuing pretext for US imperial conquest (Diana Ralph). Filmed Aug 9, 2007
On August 9, 2007 at Chautauqua Institution, NY, Paul Zarembka confronted Philip Zelikow. exec. director of the official 9/11 ... all » investigation, with a couple of uncensored questions. Professor Zarembka had done his homework. He is the editor of The Hidden History of 9-11-2001. In this video, Zarembka outlines the book's chapters: What we now know about the 9-11 hijackers (Jay Kolar); Initiation of the 9-11 operation, with evidence of insider trading beforehand (Zarembka); The destruction of the World Trade Center: why the official account cannt be true (David Ray Griffin); The military drills on 9-11: bizarre coincidence or something else? (Four Arrows aka Don Jacobs); Terrorism and Statecraft: Al-Qaeda and western covert operations after the Cold War (Nafeez Mossaddeq Ahmed); September 11 as Machiavellian State Terror (David MacGregor); Making History: the compromised 9-11 Commission (Bryan Sacks); Islamophobia and the War on Terror: the continuing pretext for US imperial conquest (Diana Ralph). Filmed Aug 9, 2007, Chautauqua, NY by snowshoefilms and Chautauqua Books.
Sunday, February 3, 2008
WTC Evidence
This clip has been in several montages about the collapse of the WTC, but this time it's from the terminally flawed 'Inside the Twin Towers' 'docu-drama' that ran on theDiscovery Channel for the 5th Anniversary of the event.
The special intersplices real 9-11 footage with dramatizations of what is supposedly occurring inside the buildings.
Somehow, this clip managed to get into the program with it's audio intact. Not only can you see the explosions racing down the side of the building, but you can hear them now too.
INSIDE WTC Before collapse
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)